When you don’t care

It seems that the Ame­ri­can (and Cana­dian) Twit­ters­phere is not inter­es­ted in the conflict in Iran. Let’s have a think about it. I wouldn’t dare draw any conclu­sions of any kind on the rea­sons for this lack of inter­est, but I have a cer­tain fee­ling of déjà vu.

In pre­vious posts, we have often seen the dua­li­ty bet­ween rather serious or even dra­ma­tic sub­jects, and the abi­li­ty to escape into ligh­ter sub­jects. Once again, I get the impres­sion that we are wit­nes­sing ano­ther such inci­dent. Without saying that our lea­ders have no inter­est in the mat­ter, rather, on the contra­ry, we might have the impres­sion that they are left to them­selves to write the upco­ming pages of his­to­ry. But is that the case?

In a majo­ri­ty of sub­jects invol­ving a large num­ber of people, we could apply a dis­tri­bu­tion of atti­tudes (not for­get­ting that eve­ry­thing is in 4 or even 5 dimen­sions and has a cer­tain poly­chro­nic aspect) to indi­vi­duals poten­tial­ly invol­ved, but who have par­ti­cu­lar know­ledge about the situa­tion. A nor­mal dis­tri­bu­tion would be quite concei­vable and would bring us to a vast majo­ri­ty (about 70%) of pas­sive people, more or less atten­tive, lea­ving us with a group divi­ded into two fac­tions: those who accept and those who refuse. I’d be curious to put that model to the test. What do you think?

-Dan­ny

I’m Dan­ny (aka Coa­ch­Dan­ny). I have a pas­sion: humans. Come with me and take this minute eve­ry day to explore what’s going on today and why is it tren­ding. Click here to get your dai­ly thought right on time for break­fast.

Sources: https://solomotivation.com

Trans­la­tion by Abbie Sims: https://www.linkedin.com/in/acsims/

Last Upda­ted on Janua­ry 23, 2020 by Coach Dan­ny